Most psychologists, perplexed by the feelings they acknowledge are aroused by aesthetic experience, have claimed that these emotions are genuine, but different in kind from nonaesthetic emotions. This, however, is a descriptive dsitinction rather than an empirical observation and consequently lacks explanatory value. On the other hand, Gombrich argues that emotional responses to art are ersatz; art triggers remembrances of previously experienced emotions. These debates have prompted the psychologist Radford to argue that people do experience real melancholy or joy in responding to art, but that these areirrational responses precisely because people know they are reacting to illusory stimuli.
絕大多數的心理學家對於藉由美學經歷所喚起的一種她們所公認的感受感到困惑，他們聲稱這些情緒是真的，是跟非美學所帶動的情緒是不一樣的。然而這只是描述性的差別而不是經驗得來的觀察而最後是缺乏了解釋的價值。另一方面來說，貢布七說道情緒反應到藝術上是"假的"，是眼睛業障重，因為是藝術驅動了先前經歷過的情緒記憶。這些爭論促使心理學家洪福特去探討到當對藝術回應時人確實經歷過真的憂傷和喜悅，但是洪福特也認為這都是不合常理的回應因為精確地說人們知道他們對幻覺的反應是如何。
托福TOEFL ibt (4)
{{ article.title }}
